Faster generation, precise editing

GPT Image 2.6

Use GPT Image 2.6 as an AI image generator and AI image editor for text-to-image prompts or reference image editing. Generate, refine, and export GIF or SVG visuals with Flare for fast iteration and Sunburst for complex layouts, fine detail, and targeted edits.

GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Sunburst

GPT Image 2.6 Flare: Fast Generation Model

See the direction quickly

For fast generation, comparison, and interactive adjustment. Get the concept into the image first, then decide what deserves another pass.

GPT Image 2.6 Sunburst: Detail and Layout Model

Give complex images another layer of care

When detail, object relationships, layout, or editing accuracy matters more, leave more room to work through the requirements that matter.

GPT Image 2.6 capabilities

Image Generation and Editing Capabilities

Generate from a text prompt or reference image, then control visual planning, targeted image edits, and the SVG, GIF, or raster format you hand off next. Each workflow begins with a direction you can review, then gives you a focused way to refine composition, selected objects, and delivery format without starting again from a blank prompt.

GPT Image 2.6 low-complexity paper-cut football championship example
Low complexity: one focused change
GPT Image 2.6 medium-complexity paper-cut football championship example
Medium complexity: detail with pace
GPT Image 2.6 high-complexity paper-cut football championship example
High complexity: complex relationships

Complexity control

Low, Medium, and High Complexity Settings

Low complexity suits one clear change. When an image has dense text, a complex layout, or several object relationships, compare a higher complexity setting.

Use low when the instruction has one dominant subject or revision. Move to medium when the result needs several details to work together, and use high when hierarchy, object placement, or readable text must be planned across the whole frame. Compare the same prompt at two settings before assuming that more complexity is always better: a simple product correction can be clearer at low, while an infographic or editorial layout may need more planning.

Markup-guided local editing

Markup-Guided Local Image Editing

The documentation example marks one vase for replacement while preserving its shape, the dried flowers, and the surrounding kitchen.

A useful markup request names both sides of the edit: identify the region to change, then state what must remain untouched. For example, mark a product label for replacement while asking to keep the bottle shape, lighting, camera angle, and background. Review the boundary of the edited region after each pass, especially where it meets text, hands, hair, reflections, or overlapping objects.

Kitchen scene before the edit
01Original image
Kitchen vase changed to cobalt-blue ceramic with Flare
02Flare result
Kitchen vase changed to cobalt-blue ceramic with Sunburst
03Sunburst result
GPT Image 2.6 Field and Flour SVG logo example
Flare SVG
GPT Image 2.6 detailed Field and Flour SVG logo example
Sunburst SVG
GPT Image 2.6 looping lantern GIF example
GPT Image 2.6 looping GIF

SVG and animated GIF output

SVG and Animated GIF Output

Use SVG when you need to adjust paths, colors, or scale. Use GIF when the result needs a looping action.

Choose SVG for marks, icons, diagrams, and simple graphics that another designer may recolor or resize. Choose an animated GIF when motion needs to play without a video control, such as a short product loop or social preview. PNG, JPEG, and WebP remain useful for raster imagery; select the format based on the next production step rather than treating one output type as the default for every image.

Multi-turn image editing

Multi-Turn Image Editing with Reference Images

Use the initial illustration as the next input. Change only its visual style while keeping the cat, otter, and their relationship intact.

Keep each follow-up request narrow enough to review. Start by confirming the composition, then change one condition such as material, lighting, style, or a selected object. Reusing the previous result makes it easier to preserve the subject identity and spatial relationships that already work, while a written record of each change makes it clear which instruction caused an unwanted shift.

  1. Gray tabby cat holding a scarf-wearing otter
    01Initial image
  2. Realistic follow-up image of the same cat and otter
    02Follow-up edit

Faster iteration

Generation Speed: 2.6 vs 2.5

With the same Luxury Travel Ad prompt, this GPT Image 2.6 example completed before the GPT Image 2.5 example. That leaves more room to compare directions, adjust the prompt, and keep the work moving.

GPT Image 2.5
7.08s

Example completion time

GPT Image 2.6
4.84s

2.24s faster in this example

Illustrative completion times for the same prompt. Actual generation time varies by prompt, image settings, and queue conditions.

Prompt Examples: Text in Images, Dense Layouts, Art Direction

Understand the brief. Keep the creative direction.

Explore how complex instructions, image text, detailed layouts, and art direction hold together across a range of examples. Each prompt identifies the visual relationships that matter, such as material, hierarchy, lighting, or the placement of small elements. Use the examples to see how a specific brief can be broken into subject, composition, text, and finish before you write your own request.

Create with GPT Image 2.6
Rainy futuristic city rendered in 3D

A rain-soaked future city with precise 3D staging and cinematic lighting

1 / 15

Creative workflows

Combine Multiple Product Reference Images

The input products and final gift set stay in one visual group, so you can judge what was carried through.

Give each reference a clear job before generating: one can establish the primary product, while others supply packaging, material, or supporting items. State which shapes, labels, colors, and proportions must remain recognizable, then describe the shared setting separately. This helps distinguish product identity from the new composition, making the result easier to review for catalog, campaign, or bundle work.

4 input reference images

Body lotion reference from the official gift basket example
Soap reference from the official gift basket example
Incense reference from the official gift basket example
Bath bomb reference from the official gift basket example
Relax and Unwind gift basket generated in the official multiple-reference example
Generated gift basket

Version comparison

GPT Image 2.6 vs GPT Image 2.5: What Changed

Both versions generate and edit images with Flare and Sunburst. GPT Image 2.6 adds controls and output types for work that needs more direction.

Swipe horizontally to compare GPT Image 2.6 and GPT Image 2.5.

GPT Image 2.6 vs GPT Image 2.5: What Changed
What to compare
GPT Image 2.5
GPT Image 2.6
Core image workflow
Generate and edit images with Flare for fast, everyday work or Sunburst when editing precision matters most.
Keeps the Flare and Sunburst choice, then adds controls for planning, targeted edits, and new delivery formats.
Composition planning
Use prompt, reference images, size, and quality to direct the result.
Adds complexity: low, medium, or high. It controls how much the model plans before rendering, which is useful for dense text, complex layouts, and object relationships.
Precise local edits
Edit an input image with a prompt that describes the requested change and the details to preserve.
Adds markup-guided edits: mark the exact area on a transparent PNG overlay, then describe the change while preserving the rest of the image.
Output and delivery
Use the standard static-image workflow with quality, size, format, and compression controls.
Adds SVG for editable, scalable graphics and animated GIF for looping motion, alongside PNG, JPEG, and WebP.
Detail vs. planning
Adjust quality, size, format, and compression to suit the static-image output you need.
Separates visual detail from composition planning: use quality for texture or small lettering, and complexity for how the layout is planned.

Credit Packs and Plans

Use one credit balance across available AI image, video, and editing tools.

Starter

$180
$144 / year
For year-round creative work at a lower annual cost.

What's included

  • About 1125 GPT Image 2.6 1K images
  • 9,000 credits issued upfront
  • Credits are valid for 365 days
  • Save 20% compared with monthly billing
Popular

Pro

$360
$288 / year
For sustained creative production with the best everyday value.

What's included

  • About 2250 GPT Image 2.6 1K images
  • 18,000 credits issued upfront
  • Credits are valid for 365 days
  • Save 20% compared with monthly billing

Max

$840
$672 / year
For high-volume annual production and long-term creative workflows.

What's included

  • About 5250 GPT Image 2.6 1K images
  • 42,000 credits issued upfront
  • Credits are valid for 365 days
  • Save 20% compared with monthly billing

Refund requests are reviewed manually. See eligibility, cancellation, and how to submit a request in our Refund Policy

GPT Image 2.6, in practical terms

Get direct answers about GPT Image 2.6 text-to-image generation, reference image editing, precise edits, and SVG or GIF output.









Make the first version the start of the work.

Start from one prompt or reference image, and give your next visual direction a path you can keep moving forward.